USPTO serial 79025369
NONANCOURT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3258955Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2007
- Examiner
- HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NONANCOURT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE, FR
NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE, FR
NEUILLY-SUR-SEINE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brewster Taylor
BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON PLLC1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEERS; MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS AND OTHER NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY, COCKTAIL MIXES, COLAS, AND SODAS; FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES; SYRUPS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, WINES, SPARKLING WINES, CHAMPAGNES, COCKTAILS WITH CHAMPAGNE WINES, BRANDY, COGNAC, EAU-DE-VIE, AND WHISKY | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | SERVICES FOR PROVIDING FOOD AND DRINK; PROVIDING TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2016 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |