USPTO serial 79025373
OIKOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3261295Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OIKOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Wells IP Law299 South Main Street, Suite 1300Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Kitchen furniture, tables, chairs, armchairs, divans, desks, bookcases, wardrobes, shelving, deck chairs, serving trolleys, drawer-units, drawers; box springs, mattresses, pillows, bedside tables, chest of drawers, mirrors | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |