Drawing for RICHARD GREEN

USPTO serial 79025420

RICHARD GREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3366012Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 8, 2008
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with RICHARD GREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ernest P. Shriver

Ernest P. Shriver Fafinski Mark & Johnson, PA775 Prairie Center DriveSuite 400Eden Prairie, MN 55344

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Fine art auctioneering servicesACTIVE—
036Art appraisal consultancy services; art valuation servicesACTIVE—
041Art exhibition services; [ education services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops and training in the field of fine art; ] art gallery servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 25, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 9, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 1, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 31, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 29, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 21, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 24, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 24, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 2, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 2, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 15, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance