Drawing for NEPENTHE QUEST

USPTO serial 79025433

NEPENTHE QUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEPENTHE QUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine and wine productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 26, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 26, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 6, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance