Drawing for SACER CUSTOS PACIS

USPTO serial 79025446

SACER CUSTOS PACIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3268565Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 24, 2007
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SACER CUSTOS PACIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand

Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP1325 Avenue of the AmericasNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033[ Alcoholic beverages, namely, vodka, wine; liqueurs and fortified wines, prepared alcoholic cocktails, ] cognac [ and other spirits, namely, Pineau des Charentes ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 5, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 18, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 2, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 31, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 12, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 6, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 30, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 4, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Oct 4, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 4, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 25, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 14, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 8, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance