Drawing for CORRADO

USPTO serial 79025531

CORRADO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORRADO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Anchovy paste; bean dip; jams; jellies; raisins; caviar; canned cooked meat; canned or bottled vegetables; canned or bottled fruits; canned fruits; gherkins; shrimps, prawns and lobsters (not live); salmon (for food purposes); pickled vegetables; pickled fish; pickled fruits; piccalilli; marmalade; rape oil (for food); edible oil; corn oil (for food); palm oil (for food); sesame oil (for food); olive oil; olive oil (for food); sunflower oil (for food); butter; ground almonds; milk; fruit pulps; meat; frozen vegetables; vegetables, instant frozen; preserved vegetables (in oil); dried vegetables; preserved, dried, cooked and grilled vegetables; preserved, dried and cooked olives; nuts (shelled, roasted or otherwise processed); tomato paste; liver paste; liver; cream; yogurt; yogurt-based beverages; kefir; milk beverages with high milk content; whey; fish cakes; fish fillets; fish mousse; fish stock; fishmeal for human consumption; poultry; cranberry sauce; applesauce; vegetable salads; fruit salads; sardines (not live); herrings (not live); vegetable-based food beverages; tuna fish (not live); frozen fruits; fruit preserves; fruit preserved in alcohol; dried fruits; lentils; potato chips; potato crisps; fruit chipsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Noodles; cloves; mustard; cakes; pastries; almond cake; farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; pasta; macaroni (uncooked); cocoa; cocoa (roasted, powdered, granulated or in drinks); capers; sweetmeat; candy; coffee; corn flakes; corn flour (for food); fruit jellies (confectionery); honey (for food); flour for food; corn flour (for food); corn meal; barley flour (for food); wheat flour (for food); tapioca flour (for food); oatmeal; muesli; pepper (spice); ketchup; sauces; chow chow; relish; tomato sauce; mayonnaise; soy sauce (soya sauce); chutney; salad dressing; fravies (terms linguistically incorrect in the opinion of the International Bureau - Rule 13(2)(b) of the common regulations); meat gravies; cinnamon; curry; spices; allspice; ginger (powdered spice); ravioli; rice; salt; vinegar; teaSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 14, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 21, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 22, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance