Drawing for SNAPCOVER

USPTO serial 79025537

SNAPCOVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3307475Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SNAPCOVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine parts, namely, roller chains, cable drag chains, conveyor chains; sprockets, being part of engines, machines or motors for land vehicles; and loading and unloading machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 9, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 2, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 23, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 23, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 13, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 13, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 27, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 30, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance