Drawing for E COMPUTER VISION TEST

USPTO serial 79025578

E COMPUTER VISION TEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3307478Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E COMPUTER VISION TEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM STSTE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles; ophthalmic lenses; spectacle lenses, including plastics lenses, mineral lenses, corrective lenses, progressive lenses, sunglass lenses, polarized lenses, tinted lenses, light-sensitive lenses, photochromic lenses, treated lenses, coated lenses, anti-reflective lenses, semi-finished lenses; spectacle lens blanks; semi-finished spectacle lens blanks; contact lenses; spectacle frames; cases for all the aforesaid goods; computer software for screening computer users' vision, for providing advice on ergonomics at the workstation and presenting solutions in terms of visual correction and comfort; computer software and computer software packages for ordering of goods and services relating to ophthalmic optics, in particular spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses and treatments or coatings therefor; magnetic and optical and electronic media prerecorded with catalogues and price lists of goods and services relating to ophthalmic optics; calculation software for customizing spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses; computer software for controlling and monitoring machines for working, machining, treating and coating spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses; computer software for checking spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses, including treated and coated lenses, and their coatingsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Opticians' services; optometrists' services; eyesight testing services; vision screening services for detecting defects and disorders; information and advisory services in the field of visual correction and/or comfortSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 3, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 11, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 16, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 16, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 15, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 7, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance