USPTO serial 79025589
JIKIDEN REIKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3256701Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 26, 2007
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JIKIDEN REIKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kyoto 602-8455, JP
Kyoto 602-8455, JP
Kyoto 602-8455, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. SCOTT ALPRIN
M. Scott Alprin Alprin Law Offices5 Pinehurst Circle, N.W.Washington, DC 20015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing training and instruction in the healing practice of Reiki | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2012 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |