Drawing for CAPITOL STEEL TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 79025603

CAPITOL STEEL TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3356531Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2007
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAPITOL STEEL TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Ryan

Thomas W. Ryan DLA Piper U.S. LLP203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys, namely magnesium, nickel, titanium, chrome and molybdenum; pipes and tubes of metal; steel products, namely tubes, flanges, pipe fittings and forged pieces made of titanium, super duplex steel, low and high nickel alloys and alloys made of stainless steel.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Production and processing of steel and metal, namely steel and metal casting and forging and/or shaping operations by hammering, including rolling, bending, welding or by a combination of two or more of these operationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research in the field of metals; technological services, namely, research in the field of forming and welding metal; industrial research, namely mechanical properties in the field of metals; industrial analysis, namely analysis of chemistries; design for others in the field of working with different types of materials, namely steel and other metals.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 26, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 15, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 11, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 25, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 27, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance