Drawing for TFT TANIS FOOD TEC

USPTO serial 79025609

TFT TANIS FOOD TEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3440842Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 3, 2008
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TFT TANIS FOOD TEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARY CATHERINE MERZ

Mary Catherine Merz Merz & Associates, P.C.1010 Lake Street, Suite 400Oak Park, IL 60301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric food processors for the preparation, aeration, whipping and filling of foodstuffs; color, flavor and acid injecting machine for center-filled food products; machines for cleaning surfaces using high pressure waterSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 22, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 9, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 13, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2007GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2007GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance