USPTO serial 79025612
KIRIESHKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 2008
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIRIESHKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Managing Company "Sibirsky Bereg" Closed Joint-Stock Company
RU
Other trademarks owned by Managing Company "Sibirsky Bereg" Closed Joint-Stock Company
Managing Company "Sibirsky Bereg" Closed Joint-Stock Company
RU
Other trademarks owned by Managing Company "Sibirsky Bereg" Closed Joint-Stock Company
Limited Liability Company "Marta-M"
RU-630055 Novosibirsk, RU
Other trademarks owned by Limited Liability Company "Marta-M"
Intellectual Property Group (IPG) Establishment
FL-9490 Vaduz, LI
Other trademarks owned by Intellectual Property Group (IPG) Establishment
Intellectual Property Group (IPG) Establishment
FL-9490 Vaduz, LI
Other trademarks owned by Intellectual Property Group (IPG) Establishment
RU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abigail R. Rubinstein
Abigail R. Rubinstein DARBY & DARBY P.C.P.O. BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Managing Company "Sibirsky Bereg" Closed Joint-Stock Company
- Other trademarks owned by Managing Company "Sibirsky Bereg" Closed Joint-Stock Company
- Other trademarks owned by Limited Liability Company "Marta-M"
- Other trademarks owned by Intellectual Property Group (IPG) Establishment
- Other trademarks owned by Intellectual Property Group (IPG) Establishment
- Other trademarks owned by LIC Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named KIRIESHKI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |