USPTO serial 79025668
MULTIGRADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIGRADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper; film, transparencies; printing substrate; media, either paper, plastic, fabric or film based, used as a printing substrate in ink jet printers; ink; ink cartridges; instruction manuals (handbooks), technical publications, catalogues, magazines and newsletters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |