USPTO serial 79025707
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | French wines, namely Champagnes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business organization and management consulting; dissemination of advertising material (leaflets, prospectuses, printed matter, samples); market studies; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; organization of trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; advertising; online advertising on a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communications by computer terminals, computer aided transmission of messages and images | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2008 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |