Drawing for Serial No. 79025707

USPTO serial 79025707

Serial No. 79025707

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79025707?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033French wines, namely ChampagnesACTIVE—
035Business organization and management consulting; dissemination of advertising material (leaflets, prospectuses, printed matter, samples); market studies; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; organization of trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; advertising; online advertising on a computer networkACTIVE—
038Communications by computer terminals, computer aided transmission of messages and imagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2008DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 28, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 28, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 14, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 6, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 28, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 7, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance