Drawing for SUPCON

USPTO serial 79025753

SUPCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers; computer peripherals; computer recorded software for industry control; check on work attendance tool; navigation apparatus for vehicles in the nature of on-board computers; surveying machines and instruments; meter component and meter material; atom power plant controlling system; electrical control panels; uninterrupted power supply; electrical distribution consoles; automatic device for power stationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 13, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 18, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 24, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 7, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 17, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 17, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 17, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance