USPTO serial 79025760
JOOLZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOOLZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |