USPTO serial 79025803
R
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3398649Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2008
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with R?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly
DAVID M. KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL.901 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric, electronic, optical, measuring, signaling and control apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic detecting machines for detecting counterfeit security or anti-piracy labels, stickers, packaging, chips, and chip cards; optical character recognition apparatus, optical filters and scanners, and encoded and non-encoded card, label and sticker equipment, namely, computer printers for printing encoded cards, labels and stickers, electronic card readers, and magnetic coded card readers, all of the above for protection against falsification of goods; machine-readable data media, namely, software for verification and tracking of original products and anti-counterfeit software; optical data media, namely, computer chips in the nature of read/write chips, and encoded labels and stickers to be used for logistic control, and for identification and detection of counterfeit products; electronically and optically encoded security labels for use in labeling of goods for counterfeit protection; encoded computer chips for identification of originals; encoded electronic chip cards for the identification of originals and magnetic cards | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Goods of paper and cardboard, not included in other classes, namely, non-encoded paper and cardboard stickers and labels, stamped and/or printed cards, namely, anti-counterfeit stickers, labels, and cards; printed labels and stickers bearing graphic representations in the nature of optical variable effects for protection against reproduction and falsification and for verification and tracking of original products | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Consulting services for business management, in particular in connection with the design and production of systems for protection against falsification of goods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Originize IP AG
- Other trademarks owned by Originize IP AG; c/o Inco Consulting AG
- Other trademarks owned by Originize IP AG; c/o Inco Consulting AG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named R
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |