Drawing for Serial No. 79025804

USPTO serial 79025804

Serial No. 79025804

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3348736Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2007
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79025804?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David M. Kelly

DAVID M. KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT901 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric, electronic, optical, measuring, signaling and control apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic detecting machines for detecting counterfeit security or anti-piracy labels, stickers, packaging, chips, and chip cards; optical character recognition apparatus, optical filters and scanners, and encoded and non-encoded card, label and sticker equipment, namely, computer printers for printing encoded cards, labels and stickers, electronic card readers, and magnetic coded card readers, all of the above for protection against falsification of goods; machine-readable data media, namely, software for verification and tracking of original products and anti-counterfeit software; optical data media, namely, computer chips in the nature of read/write chips, and encoded labels and stickers to be used for logistic control, and for identification and detection of counterfeit products; electronically and optically encoded security labels for use in labeling of goods for counterfeit protection; encoded computer chips for identification of originals; encoded electronic chip cards for the identification of originals and magnetic cards.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016Goods of paper and cardboard, not included in other classes, namely, non-encoded paper and cardboard stickers and labels, stamped and/or printed cards, namely anti-counterfeit stickers, labels, and cards; printed labels and stickers bearing graphic representations in the nature of optical variable effects for protection against reproduction and falsification and for verification and tracking of original products.SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Consulting services for business management, in particular in connection with the design and production of systems for protection against falsification of goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 25, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 31, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 10, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Mar 11, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 11, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 9, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance