Drawing for BANTBORU

USPTO serial 79025876

BANTBORU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3247819Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 29, 2007
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BANTBORU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. EGBERT

JOHN S. EGBERT Egbert Law Offices, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Ste. 1250HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Copper coated double wall steel tubes and pipes used by third parties in the automotive industry as brake and oil lines and as condenser tubing in the refrigeration industry; zinc plates and sheets; copper plates and sheetsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
007Fuel injection nozzlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
017Non-metal fuel oil hosesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 29, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 27, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 29, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 12, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 7, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 7, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 7, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 10, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance