Drawing for CONSED

USPTO serial 79025914

CONSED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3258958Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 3, 2007
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONSED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosemary S. Tarlton and Sherri N. Blount, Lindsay T. Braunig, Barry E. Bretschneider, Thomas E. Ciotti, John F. Delaney, Stephen C. Durant, Kimberly A. Eckhart, Maame A.F. Ewusi-Mensah, Christopher E. George, Edward W. Gray, Jr., Douglas Hendricks, Lynn M

ROSEMARY S TARLTON & SHERRI N BLOUNT MORRISON & FOESTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations and substances to effect sedation; sedativesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 10, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 10, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 7, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 26, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 7, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance