Drawing for 24-7 ENTERTAINMENT

USPTO serial 79025933

24-7 ENTERTAINMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 24-7 ENTERTAINMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, providing access to a computer network; provision of telecommunication access to data or documents stored electronically in central files for remote viewing or downloading via the Internet, in particular, videos, music files, computer game programs, telephone ring tones, computer screen saver programs, and computer screen wallpaper image filesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 1, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 1, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 7, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 7, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 30, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance