CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MAPME

USPTO serial 79025957

MAPME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3480748Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 5, 2008
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAPME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fruit, namely, apples, pears, apricots, peaches, preserved, stewed and driedSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Pastry and confectionery, namely, dessert souffle sweetmeat, dessert souffle sweetmeat covered with chocolate, pastilles, fruit jellies, fruit jellies covered with chocolate, chewing fruit jellies, candies, marmalade stuffed candies, souffle sweetmeat stuffed candies; chocolate, chocolate sweets, including marmalade stuffed chocolates, souffle sweetmeat stuffed chocolates, candies of marmalade, sweetmeats in the form of drops covered with sugar or sugar powder and having fruit stuff, including cranberry; chocolate covered nuts, dessert souffle, caramels, lollipops, pastilles, fondants, pralines, halvah, cakes, marzipanSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 11, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 11, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 31, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 31, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 6, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 6, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance