Drawing for Serial No. 79025958

USPTO serial 79025958

Serial No. 79025958

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3480749Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 5, 2008
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with Serial No. 79025958?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana Stewart-Mekdara

Dana Stewart-Mekdara Global Trademarks, Inc.505 S. Villa Real Drive, Suite 102Anaheim Hills, CA 92807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030[ Pastry and ] confectionery, namely, dessert souffle sweetmeat, dessert souffle sweetmeat covered with chocolate, pastilles, fruit jellies, fruit jellies covered with chocolate, [ chewing fruit jellies, candies, ] marmalade stuffed candies, souffle sweetmeat stuffed candies; [ chocolate, chocolate sweets, including marmalade stuffed chocolates, souffle sweetmeat stuffed chocolates, ] candies of marmalade, sweetmeats in the form of drops covered with sugar or sugar powder and having fruit stuff, including cranberry; [ chocolate covered nuts, ] dessert souffle [, caramels, lollipops, pastilles, fondants, pralines, halvah, cakes, marzipan ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 7, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 5, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 24, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 5, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 5, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 30, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 19, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 19, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 5, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2008PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2008ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 19, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 26, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance