USPTO serial 79025961
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NL-3013 AL Rotterdam, NL
Stichting Choices International Foundation
NL-2518 AD DEN HAAG, NL
Other trademarks owned by Stichting Choices International Foundation
Stichting Choices International Foundation
NL-2518 AD DEN HAAG, NL
Other trademarks owned by Stichting Choices International Foundation
Stichting Choices International Foundation
NL-2518 AD DEN HAAG, NL
Other trademarks owned by Stichting Choices International Foundation
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; edible oils and fats; olive oil; milk-based and yogurt-based beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | tea; cereal based snack bars; frozen confections; mustard; ketchup; sauces, excluding apple sauce and cranberry sauce; spices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | non-alcoholic fruit-based beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Dietary advice | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |