Drawing for Serial No. 79025961

USPTO serial 79025961

Serial No. 79025961

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3527649Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 4, 2008
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79025961?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; edible oils and fats; olive oil; milk-based and yogurt-based beveragesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030tea; cereal based snack bars; frozen confections; mustard; ketchup; sauces, excluding apple sauce and cranberry sauce; spicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032non-alcoholic fruit-based beveragesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Dietary adviceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 9, 2016LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 4, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 28, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 5, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 5, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 5, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 4, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 25, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 17, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 18, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 10, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance