Drawing for TCHIBO EXCLUSIVE

USPTO serial 79025978

TCHIBO EXCLUSIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3366015Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 8, 2008
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with TCHIBO EXCLUSIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Ehrlich

David Ehrlich Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, [ coffee extract, ] instant coffeeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 28, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 25, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 13, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 28, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 20, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Feb 8, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Feb 8, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 8, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 30, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 9, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2008DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2007PBPRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - ESU SUPERVISOR REQUEST—
Aug 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance