USPTO serial 79025980
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Lyhus
John E. Lyhus Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP120 S. LaSalle StreetSuite 2100Chicago, IL 60603| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINE TOOLS, NAMELY, COMPUTER CONTROLLED BENDING, FOLDING AND FLANGE FORMING MACHINES; POWER DRIVEN HAND-HELD TOOLS, NAMELY, BENDING, FOLDING AND FLANGE FORMING MACHINES; WORKPIECE MOVEMENT INSTALLATIONS FOR LOADING AND ORIENTING WORKPIECES IN MACHINES AND FOR REMOVING AND SORTING PROCESSED WORKPIECES, NAMELY, CONVEYORS AND WORKPIECE PROCESSING MACHINES TO SORT PARTS OF DIFFERENT SHAPES OR DIMENSIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | COMPUTER CONTROLS FOR IMPUTTING CONTROL INFORMATION AND DISPLAY TERMINALS TO MONITOR OPERATION OF MACHINE TOOLS; BENDING, FOLDING AND FLANGE FORMING SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING THE MACHINE TOOLS AND FOR MONITORING OPERATION OF THE MACHINE TOOLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE, SERVICING AND REPAIR OF BENDING, FOLDING AND FLANGE FORMING MACHINE TOOLS, INCLUDING SUCH SERVICES PROVIDED REMOTELY BY MEANS OF ELECTRONIC DATA LINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | INDIVIDUAL CONSULTATION AND ASSISTANCE IN PROGRAMMING OF BENDING, FOLDING AND FLANGE FORMING MACHINE TOOLS AND MATERIAL HANDLING AND TRANSPORTING SYSTEMS; DESIGNING TOOLING | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |