Drawing for SQ2 DRUM SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79025987

SQ2 DRUM SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3237696Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2007
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SQ2 DRUM SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside PlazaSuite 1500Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Musical instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 20, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jul 21, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 21, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 21, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 26, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 1, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 15, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 15, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 15, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 26, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance