Drawing for OVOHARD

USPTO serial 79026022

OVOHARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3401990Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 25, 2008
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OVOHARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KARL HORMANN

KARL HORMANN LAW OFFICE OS KARL HORMANNP O BOX 38151686 SPARKS STCAMBRIDGE, MA 02238-1516

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical preservatives for processing spawn from marine creaturesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
029Caviar from chemically preserved spawn from marine creatures of all kindsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
031Untreated spawn from marine creatures of all kindsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Chemical preservation processes for processing spawn from marine creatures; smoking of spawn from marine creaturesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 25, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 19, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 31, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 7, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 27, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance