USPTO serial 79026048
'O SOLE 'E NAPULE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3436175Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 27, 2008
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 'O SOLE 'E NAPULE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
O' Sole é Napule di Calabria alfonso s.r.l.
I-80034 Marigliano (Napoli), IT
Other trademarks owned by O' Sole é Napule di Calabria alfonso s.r.l.
O' Sole é Napule di Calabria alfonso s.r.l.
I-80034 Marigliano (Napoli), IT
Other trademarks owned by O' Sole é Napule di Calabria alfonso s.r.l.
O' Sole é Napule di Calabria alfonso s.r.l.
I-80034 Marigliano (Napoli), IT
Other trademarks owned by O' Sole é Napule di Calabria alfonso s.r.l.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; edible oils and fats | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals, cereal based snack food; confectionary chips for baking, preparations made from confectionery, namely, fruit jellies, frozen yoghurt; pastries; honey; treacle; sauces, namely, pepper sauce and catsup, used as condiments; spices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks, soft drinks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by O' Sole é Napule di Calabria alfonso s.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by O' Sole é Napule di Calabria alfonso s.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by O' Sole é Napule di Calabria alfonso s.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named 'O SOLE 'E NAPULE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |