USPTO serial 79026055
MATIS PROFESSIONAL SKINCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3431360Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 20, 2008
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MATIS PROFESSIONAL SKINCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS S. BAKER, JR.
1371 WEST 3RD AVENUECOLUMBUS, OH 43212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, perfumery, essential oils; cosmetics, including creams and lotions for skin care; hair lotions, dentifrices | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |