USPTO serial 79026060
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Bagarazzi
James M. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments, namely scanning probes for use in scanning probe microscopes for detecting structures on the submicron scale by mechanically contacting said structures | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | [ Material processing, namely, using semiconductor processing methods for the coating of carrier materials, namely, silicon, carbon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, or silicon carbide in the preparation of probes for scanning microscopes; custom production of prods for probe devices for microscopes that use additive and/or subtractive, chemical and/or mechanical and/or electronic methods; materials processing of probe devices, namely, scanning probes for microscopes by coating, using mechanical or electronic or chemical methods; treatment of materials, namely, silicon, carbon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, or silicon carbide, by coating, etching, metallizing, annealing, oxidizing or laser treatment; coating silicon, carbon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, or silicon carbide with metals, insulators, semiconductors or organic chemicals for the purpose of producing conductive probes, insulating probes or semi-conducting probes for scanning microscopes ; etching of surfaces, namely, silicon, carbon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, or silicon carbide by using wet chemical, dry chemical or mechanical or electronic methods. ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Scientific and industrial research, namely, in the area of mesoscopic technology; development of calibrations standards; using scanning electron microscopes and atomic force microscopes to analyze surfaces and present visual representations of the surfaces so analyzed; scientific investigations, scientific analyses, scientific recordings, and scientific evaluations, namely, using scanning electron microscopes and atomic force microscopes, in the field of microtechnology or nanotechnology. ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 19, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |