Drawing for CARLO PICCOLOMINI

USPTO serial 79026066

CARLO PICCOLOMINI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARLO PICCOLOMINI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS M CHAMPAGNE

THOMAS M CHAMPAGNE IP STRATEGIES PC1730 N LYNN STSTE 500ARLINGTON, VA 22209

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003PerfumerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
014Necklaces, bracelets, earrings, pendants, rings being jewelry, cuff-links, wrist watches, portraits made of silver, boxes made of silverSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Leather belts, leather bags, wallets, leather suitcases, trunks for luggage, leather briefcases, document holders made of leatherSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 30, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2007UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2007NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Jan 26, 2007NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 9, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance