Drawing for MEDICAL VISION

USPTO serial 79026103

MEDICAL VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHOE, KELLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDICAL VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; orthopedic articles; suture materialsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
035MarketingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
037Repair and installation of medical equipmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Research; design and development of medical equipmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 4, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 18, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Nov 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Aug 24, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance