Drawing for MMC

USPTO serial 79026109

MMC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MMC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Ink for photocopiers; toners for photocopiers; filled toner cartridges for printers, word processors and laser printers; ink for printers; diazo toners for photocopiersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Personal stereo devices, namely MP3 players; personal stereo devices, MP4 players; computer memories, namely USB flash memory cards; blank integrated circuit cards, namely memory cards; computer peripheral; blank compact disks; blank floppy disks; blank optical disksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 2, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 18, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 31, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance