Drawing for LUMAR

USPTO serial 79026136

LUMAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUMAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Stick liquorice as confectionery; biscuits; confectionery for decorating Christmas trees; cookies; cake; cake paste; edible decorations for cakes; fragrances for pastry; cake powder; cake with fruit; candy for food; chocolate; cookies; petit-beurre biscuits; cocoa; cocoa products; caramels as candy; sugar-coated sweets; crackers; macaroons as pastry; mint for confectionery; peppermint sweets; almond confectionery; honey; muesli; peanut confectionery; edible decorations for cakes; almond paste, pastilles as confectionery; gingerbread; fondants as confectionery; pralines; sugar confectionery; maltose; malt for human consumption; rusks; wafers; corn flakes; maize flakes; oat flakes; confectionery; halvah; cocoa glaze; marzipan; connected with this class-- products coated with caramel mass; fat mass products; cocoa fat products, products in chocolate; chocolated products; chocolated soft core sweets; chocolated caramel core sweets; chocolated soft core pills; chocolated pills; chocolated bisonits (terms considered incomprehensible in the opinion of the International Bureau - Rule 13;2)b) of the Common Regulations); chocolated gingerbread and chocolated wafersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 24, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 7, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance