USPTO serial 79026136
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Stick liquorice as confectionery; biscuits; confectionery for decorating Christmas trees; cookies; cake; cake paste; edible decorations for cakes; fragrances for pastry; cake powder; cake with fruit; candy for food; chocolate; cookies; petit-beurre biscuits; cocoa; cocoa products; caramels as candy; sugar-coated sweets; crackers; macaroons as pastry; mint for confectionery; peppermint sweets; almond confectionery; honey; muesli; peanut confectionery; edible decorations for cakes; almond paste, pastilles as confectionery; gingerbread; fondants as confectionery; pralines; sugar confectionery; maltose; malt for human consumption; rusks; wafers; corn flakes; maize flakes; oat flakes; confectionery; halvah; cocoa glaze; marzipan; connected with this class-- products coated with caramel mass; fat mass products; cocoa fat products, products in chocolate; chocolated products; chocolated soft core sweets; chocolated caramel core sweets; chocolated soft core pills; chocolated pills; chocolated bisonits (terms considered incomprehensible in the opinion of the International Bureau - Rule 13;2)b) of the Common Regulations); chocolated gingerbread and chocolated wafers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |