Drawing for VENTOFLEX

USPTO serial 79026142

VENTOFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3373214Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2008
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENTOFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK S. BICKS

MARK S. BICKS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN, L.L.P1300 19TH STREET, N.W., SUITE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Industrial fabrics, made mostly of metal for industrial purposes, sheets or mesh sheets made mostly of metal for industrial purposes including conveyor belts, for draining or filtering sludge, and for shapingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Machines for the paper industry, namely, paper making machines, parts of paper making machines for paper industry, namely, sieves of metal and plastic, sieve rollers, dandy rolls, dandy roll formers and parts for dandy roll installations, flotation pulp catchers, thickener mechanisms, filter drums and worm extruders, and wire cloths, pre-compression rollers, cylinder moulds, parts of paper making machines, namely, industrial fabrics made of metal and/or plastic; paper sieves, namely, papermaking machine sievesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
017Plastic in sheets for general industrial use, namely, sheets of plastic fabric for conveyor belts, for draining or filtering sludge, and for surface shapingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 25, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 29, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 29, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 27, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2007GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 19, 2007GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2007GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Aug 22, 2007GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 31, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance