Drawing for QUANTAX

USPTO serial 79026161

QUANTAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3398651Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 18, 2008
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with QUANTAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce S. Londa

Bruce S. Londa Norris McLaughlin P.A.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009X-ray spectrometers not for medical use, being laboratory equipment; computer software for use in calculating data, producing reports of readings, scientific analysis of minerals, alloys, semiconductors, dust particles, solids particles and all samples analyzable in vacuum for X-ray spectrometers; downloadable computer software for use in calculating data, producing reports of readings, scientific analysis of minerals, alloys, semiconductors, dust particles, solids particles and all samples analyzable in vacuum for x-ray spectrometersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 26, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 3, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 27, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 29, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 25, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 20, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 20, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 1, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 22, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 8, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance