USPTO serial 79026203
NANOFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3378811Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2008
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NANOFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Industrial fabrics, made mostly of metal for industrial purposes, sheets or mesh sheets made mostly of metal for industrial purposes including conveyor belts, for draining or filtering sludge, and for shaping * all mentioned goods only for the paper industry * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Machines for the paper industry, namely, paper making machines, parts of paper making machines for paper industry, namely, sieves of metal and plastic, sieve rollers, dandy rolls, dandy roll formers and parts for dandy roll installations, flotation pulp catchers, thickener mechanisms, filter drums and worm extruders, and wire cloths, pre-compression rollers, cylinder moulds, parts of paper making machines, namely, industrial fabrics made of metal and/or plastic; paper sieves, namely, papermaking machine sieves * all mentioned goods only for the paper industry * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Plastic in sheets for general industrial use, namely, sheets of plastic fabric for conveyor belts, for draining or filtering sludge, and for surface shaping | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Andreas Kufferath GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Andreas Kufferath GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Andreas Kufferath GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Andritz Technology and Asset Management GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named NANOFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 27, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |