USPTO serial 79026214
DAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3531110Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2008
- Examiner
- BUNCH, TASHIA AUNGELIK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY CATHERINE MERZ
MARY CATHERINE MERZ MERZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.1140 LAKE STREET, SUITE 304OAK PARK, IL 60301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Airplane engines and marine engines; transmission couplings and belts excluding those for land vehicles; transmission mechanisms not for land vehicles; power-operated automotive tools and components parts, namely, hand-held tools, mechanically operated tools for maintenance and repair of vehicles, namely, adapter for puller for injector and sun cap nuts, engine cranking tool, boost pressure socket, dummy injector, press-in tool for injector sleeve and assembly tool for roller tappets, and parts for these products not included in other classes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Vehicles, namely, trucks and buses; engines for land vehicles; lorries, motor buses, trailers and semi-trailers; parts and accessories for land vehicles, not included in other classes, namely, couplings, transmissions and transmission belts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2020 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |