Drawing for CROSSVISION

USPTO serial 79026266

CROSSVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3485070Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 12, 2008
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROSSVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeanette S. Zimmer

Jeanette S. Zimmer Schiff Hardin LLPP.O. Box 06079Chicago, IL 60606-0079UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs and software for use in designing and developing service-oriented architecturesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Design for others and development of computer programs, licensing and renting of computer programs; maintenance and installation of computer programsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 20, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 27, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 13, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 13, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 30, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 4, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 12, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 7, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 19, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 18, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance