USPTO serial 79026318
SUPERCHESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERCHESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-69006 Lyon, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games, namely, advanced level chess games | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education, namely, developing, arranging and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction in the field of chess, publication of texts, books, magazines and other printed matter, publishing of electronic publications; entertainment, namely, providing a website featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring chess, multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games and electronic publications, production of DVDs, videotapes and television programs featuring chess, providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users, organizing and conducting chess clubs, associations and federations, organizing and conducting chess contests, competions, conferences and exhibitions, sporting and cultural activities, namely, organizing and conducting chess tournaments and championships | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |