USPTO serial 79026321
GEMINSTANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEMINSTANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus and equipment; computers; peripheral devices for computers; software for writing programs for electronic chip cards, card readers and apparatus and equipment using chip cards; computer programs; operating programs and systems for chip card readers; encoding and microprogramming systems; chips; integrated circuits; printed circuits; microcircuits; electronic chip cards; integrated circuit cards; microcircuit cards; memory cards; magnetic cards; electronic cards; contactless cards; plastic cards; biodegradable cards; subscriber identification cards; electronic purses; devices for accessing and controlling access to data processing apparatus and equipment; identification and authentication devices for use with data processing apparatus and equipment; telephone network access, access control, identification and authentication devices; decrypting and encrypting programs and circuits | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Communications by computer terminals; telephone communications; transmission of messages and data between a terminal (telephone, agenda, laptop computer) and an electronic chip card | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Professional consultancy unrelated to business dealings (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau (rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations)); computer consultancy services; services in connection with the study, customization installing and implementing of software, chip cards, integrated circuit cards, microcircuit cards, memory cards, magnetic cards, electronic cards, contactless cards, plastic cards and biodegradable cards; study and expert evaluation services in the field of computing; information technology related technical project studies; software updating services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |