USPTO serial 79026352
ÇIMSTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ÇIMSTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ÇIMSTONE DOGAL KOMPOZE TAS; ISLETMELERI; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM
TR
Other trademarks owned by ÇIMSTONE DOGAL KOMPOZE TAS; ISLETMELERI; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM
AKG YALITIM VE INSAAT MALZEMELERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AKG YALITIM VE INSAAT MALZEMELERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Aerated autoclaved concrete construction materials and elements, namely, floor blocks, bricks, posts, slabs, reinforced load bearing panels, applicable with thin bed mortar and regular mortar; prefabricated constructions, namely, blocks, bricks, posts, slabs, and panels; aerated autoclaved concrete slag, ready-mixed plasters and mortars, natural composite stones, quartz based natural composite stones and faience tiles, granite and quartz based stones, granites, engineered granites, granite stones; asphalt, pitch, bitumen asphalt, tar, namely, tar-based sealants for roofing, driveways, asphalt; Geotextile materials used for construction, surfacing and repairing of roads; sand, gravel, mosaic bricks, posts, slabs, panels, and tiles for building; cover stone, namely, paving stones; dry mixtures also known as aggregates composed of natural materials, namely, sand stone, sand, gravel, aquarium sands, lime for construction; cement mixes; gypsum; ready-mixed concrete, ready-mixed mortar, ready-mixed plaster, ready-mixed colored plaster; natural stones for decorative construction; engineered stones for decorative construction; natural marbles, marble based engineered stones for decorative construction; flooring, namely, hard surface covering composed of quartz-based resin bonded composite stone for floors and resilient hard surface covering for floors, walls and other surfaces; internal and external cladding made of natural or engineered stones for construction and building; non-metal tiles, faiences, namely, earthenware tiles, paving stones, curbstones; door, wall, fence, and roof panels made of gypsum; wall panels not of metal, walls, namely, wall boards, wall panels not metal, wall stone, separators, namely, wall boards for separating space within rooms; construction material, namely, prefabricated structure elements made of gypsum, namely, blocks, bricks, posts, slabs, panels; bricks; clay, ceramic, and stone roof covering tiles; floor blocks composed of quartz, stone, and artificial resin; concrete blocks, ridge tiles composed of quartz, stone, and artificial resin ; monuments and sculptures made out of concrete, stone or marble, semi-processed woods, wooden poles, woods, wooden beams, crossbeams; natural or synthetic surface coatings in the form of strips or plates, synthetic coatings that can be bonded by heat for use in construction; non-metal prefabricated swimming pools | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ÇIMSTONE DOGAL KOMPOZE TAS; ISLETMELERI; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM
- Other trademarks owned by AKG YALITIM VE INSAAT MALZEMELERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named ÇIMSTONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |