Drawing for LIBRARIAN

USPTO serial 79026407

LIBRARIAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIBRARIAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic storage devices for storing compact discs, DVDs and other data storage media; computer software for controlling or operating such devices and for managing the storage of such media; computerized storage systems for storing compact discs, DVDs and other storage mediaSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 27, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 6, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 19, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance