Drawing for FAPLAC

USPTO serial 79026413

FAPLAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3291188Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 11, 2007
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAPLAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum/Charles S. Murray, Jr.

CABINET HARLE ET PHELIP7, RUE DE MADRIDF PARIS, 75008FRANCE

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Industrial chemicals, namely, hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid, hydrofluoric acid, nitric acid; acids for pickling metalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Apparatus and instruments for measuring and for physico-chemical analyses of the quality of acid baths for pickling steel strips; computer software for processing information supplied by the aforesaid measuring and analysis apparatus and instruments; software for managing the quality of acid baths for pickling steel strips used for directing continuous circulation and regeneration systems for acid bathsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Treatment of metals; pickling of strips of steel and bands of steel alloysSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 19, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 28, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 13, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 18, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 18, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 3, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 11, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 26, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance