Drawing for PSGUARD

USPTO serial 79026419

PSGUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUKEN, BONNIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PSGUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data processing equipment; computers and computer peripherals; electronic apparatus and devices for regulating, monitoring, controlling and protecting industrial power utility assets, in particular for transmitting electricity and for energy distribution networks; software; downloadable electronic publicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Services of engineersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 12, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 7, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2007CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 22, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance