Drawing for DURATRONICS

USPTO serial 79026436

DURATRONICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3543716Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 9, 2008
Examiner
GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURATRONICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dean B. Watson

Dean B. Watson Dura Automotive Systems, LLC1780 Pond RunAuburn Hills, MI 48326UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical and electronic devices for motor vehicles, namely, circuit boards, motor controllers, distance detectors and fault detectorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011[ Lights for motor vehicles ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 21, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 12, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 12, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 7, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 25, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 13, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 23, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 13, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Jan 13, 201571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 13, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 9, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance