USPTO serial 79026436
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dura Automotive Holding GmbH & Co. KG
37574 Einbeck, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dura Automotive Holding GmbH & Co. KG
Dura Automotive Holding GmbH & Co. KG
37574 Einbeck, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dura Automotive Holding GmbH & Co. KG
Dura Automotive Holding GmbH & Co. KG
37574 Einbeck, DE
Other trademarks owned by Dura Automotive Holding GmbH & Co. KG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dean B. Watson
Dean B. Watson Dura Automotive Systems, LLC1780 Pond RunAuburn Hills, MI 48326UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 13, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |