USPTO serial 79026499
JETSIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3445355Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2008
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JETSIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chichester, West Sussex, GB
Chichester, West Sussex, GB
GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NICOLE M. MEYER
Nicole M. Meyer Dickinson Wright PLLC1875 Eye Street, N.W.Suite 1200Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Flexible non-metal, plastic, or rubber hoses; rubber hoses; flanged non-metal, plastic, or rubber elbow hoses; flexible non-metal, plastic, or rubber bellows; non-metal, plastic, or rubber expansion bellows; preformed non-metal, plastic, or rubber hoses; pipe and hose linings made from rubber, synthetic rubber, or plastic, for industrial, nautical, and plumbing use as a conduit for conveying liquids | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |