USPTO serial 79026509
HORIZONT KLEMMFIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3427012Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2008
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HORIZONT KLEMMFIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
Jordan A. LaVine Flaster/Greenberg P.C.1835 Market StreetSuite 1050PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ Metal base plates for use with traffic safety products, namely, beacons, bollards, posts, and signboards; metal ground beams for use with traffic safety products; metal holders and metal brackets for use with traffic safety products, namely, signboards; metal signboards; metal barrier chains; metal fences; metal boards for traffic control; metal posts; metal bollards; metal guard rails and crash barriers for roads and traffic control; metal mounting devices for traffic safety products ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Optical, measuring, signaling, checking or supervision, life-saving apparatus and instruments, namely, [ reflectors for traffic signals, ] traffic lights, and traffic light apparatus; electric apparatus and instruments for traffic guidance technology, namely, traffic lights and electronic components and parts therefor; [ electric fences; electric cables and parts therefor; electric wires and parts therefor; electrical conductors and parts therefor; electrical fencing wires; parts for electric fences, namely, electric fencing stakes; modular electric fences; electric fencing wire; electric fencing stakes ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | [ Reflectors for use on traffic safety devices, particularly for use on traffic barriers, traffic posts, signboards, and traffic cones ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Traffic guidance systems and parts therefor, namely, [ plastic barrier fences and boards, ] plastic posts and bollards, [ plastic mounting devices in the nature of bases for fences, and posts; ] crash barriers of plastic for roads; [ non-metal fences; concrete bollards ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | [ Traffic guidance systems and parts therefor, namely, plastic signboards, plastic holders for sign boards, plastic brackets for use with traffic safety devices and plastic base plates for beacons and signboards ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Horizont Group GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Horizont Group GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Horizont Group GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named HORIZONT KLEMMFIX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 16, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 18, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |