USPTO serial 79026523
ENNOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3366020Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2008
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ENNOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bassam N. Ibrahim
Bassam N. Ibrahim Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, P.C.1737 KING STREET, SUITE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING, ANALYSIS AND REPORTING OF SURVEYS IN THE FIELD OF ENTERPRISE FEEDBACK MANAGEMENT IN THE FORM OF EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEYS, CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEYS AND WEBSITE ANALYSIS; BUSINESS SURVEY SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEMINARS AND TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS SURVEY INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS AND DISTRIBUTION OF COURSE MATERIAL IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Design, development and implementation of software in the field of enterprise feedback management in the form of employee engagement surveys, customer satisfaction surveys and website analysis ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Markedsconsult A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Markedsconsult A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Ennova A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Markedsconsult A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENNOVA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |